Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access August 26, 2014

Environmental Regulation of a Global Pollution Externality in a Bilateral Trade Framework: The Case of Global Warming, China and the US

  • Johnson Gwatipedza EMAIL logo and Edward B. Barbier
From the journal Economics

Abstract

Bilateral trade and capital flows have increased substantially between the United States and China yielding economic gains to both countries. However, these beneficial bilateral relations also bring about global environmental consequences including greenhouse gas emissions. We develop a footloose capital model of international trade between the North (United States) and the South (China) in the presence of a global pollution externality. Each country’s share of global pollution depends on its share of world capital. We show that, if the disutility of pollution in the United States is high, there will be pressure on the US to raise environmental regulations on industry. Capital will move to China. Because the increased pollution in China has global effects, the US may not benefit from the environmental restrictions and a joint regulation of pollution by both parties may be a preferred outcome. We also show that the implementation of differential control policies by the parties may also be optimal.

JEL Classification: D43; Q54; F18

References

Antholis, W. (2009). Toward a successful climate agreement: building trust and ambition. In Brookings Institution. In: Climate change policy: recommendations to reach consensus. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 2009, pp. 16–25. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2009/9/climate%20change%20poverty/09_climate_change_poverty_antholis.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Baldwin, R. (1999). Agglomeration and endogenous capital. European Economic Review 43(2): 253–280. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eecrev/v43y1999i2p253-280.html10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00067-1Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, R., R. Forslid, P. Martin, G. Ottaviano, and F. Robert-Nicoud (2003). Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Search in Google Scholar

Behrens, K., A. L. Lamorgese, G. I.P. Ottaviano, and T. Tabuchi (2009). Beyond the home market effect: Market specialization in a multi-country world. Journal of International Economics 79(2): 259–265. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v79y2009i2p259-265.html10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.08.005Search in Google Scholar

Benarroch, M., and H. Thille (2001). Trans-boundary pollution and the gains from trade. Journal of International Economics 55(1): 139–159. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeinecon/v_3a55_3ay_3a2001_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a139-159.htmSearch in Google Scholar

Benarroch, M., and R. Weder (2006). Intra-industry trade in intermediate products, pollution and internationally increasing returns, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52(3): 675–689. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v52y2006i3p675-689.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Blinder, A. S. (2009). How many US Jobs might be offshorable. World Economics 10(2): 41–78. http://ideas.repec.org/a/wej/wldecn/376.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Broda, C., and D. E. Weinstein (2006). Globalization and the gains from variety. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2): 541–585. http://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/qjecon/v121y2006i2p541-585.html10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541Search in Google Scholar

Carraro, C., and D. Siniscalco (1998). International institutions and environmental policy: international environmental agreements, incentives and political economy. European Economic Review 42(3–5): 351–372. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eecrev/v42y1998i3-5p561-572.html10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00118-9Search in Google Scholar

Caplan, A.J., and E.C.D. Silva (2007). An equitable, efficient, and implementable scheme to control global carbon dioxide emissions. International Trade and Public Finance 14(3): 263–279. http://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/itaxpf/v14y2007i3p263-279.html10.1007/s10797-006-9002-zSearch in Google Scholar

de Zeeuw, A. (2008). Dynamic effects on the stability of international environmental agreements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55: 163–174. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v55y2008i2p163-174.html10.1016/j.jeem.2007.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Duval, Y., and S. F. Hamilton (2002). Strategic environmental policy and international trade in asymmetric oligopoly markets. International Tax and Public Finance 9(3): 259–271. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapitaxpf/v_3a9_3ay_3a2002_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a259 271.htm10.1023/A:1016268213772Search in Google Scholar

Elbers, C., and C. Withagen (2004). Environmental policy, population dynamics and agglomeration. Contrib. Econ. Anal. Pol. 3(2) (Article3). http://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bejeap/vcontributions.3y2004i2n3.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Ewing, J. J. (2012). From Kyoto to Durban: the fits and starts of global climate change negotiations, Insight. February: 1–8. http://www.rsis.edu.sg/nts/HTML-Newsletter/Insight/NTS-Insight-Feb-1201.html.Search in Google Scholar

Foot, R. (2010). China and the United States: Between cold and warm peace. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 51(6): 123–146. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00396330903461708#.VABlw2TV_AwSearch in Google Scholar

Foot, R., and A. Walter (2013). Global norms and major state behaviour: The cases of China and the United States. European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 329–352. http://ejt.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/02/01/135406611142526110.1177/1354066111425261Search in Google Scholar

Inman, M. (2008) Carbon is forever, Nature 2:156–158. http://www.nature.com/climate/2008/0812/pdf/climate.2008.122.pdf10.1038/climate.2008.122Search in Google Scholar

IPCC, Summary for Policymakers. (2007). In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds). Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Kikuchi, T., and K. Shimomura (2007). Monopolistic competition with cross country technological differences and international trade. Japan and the World Economy. 19(2): 236–247. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092214250500083610.1016/j.japwor.2005.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Krugman, P.R. (2008). Trade and wages reconsidered. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 39(1): 103–154). http://ideas.repec.org/a/bin/bpeajo/v39y2008i2008-01p103-154.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Kunce, M., and J.F. Shogren (2005). On the inter-jurisdictional competition and environmental federalism. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50(19): 212–224. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v50y2005i1p212-224.html10.1016/j.jeem.2004.11.004Search in Google Scholar

Lieberthal, K., and D. Sandalow (2009). Overcoming obstacles to U.S.–China cooperation on climate change. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2009/1/climate%20change%20lieberthal%20sandalow/01_climate_change_lieberthal_sandalow.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Markusen, J. R., E.R. Morey, and N. Olewiler (1995). Competition in regional environmental policies when plant leaks are endogenous. Journal of Public Economics 56(1): 55–57. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pubeco/v56y1995i1p55-77.html10.1016/0047-2727(94)01419-OSearch in Google Scholar

Martin, P., and C. A. Rogers (1995). Industrial location and public infrastructure. Journal of International Economics. 39(3–4): 335–351. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v39y1995i3-4p335-351.html10.1016/0022-1996(95)01376-6Search in Google Scholar

McCauley, R.M. (2003). Capital flows in East Asia since the 1997 crisis. BIS Quarterly Review June: 41–56. http://philiplane.typepad.com/wbifi/K_flows_in_E_Asian_since_1997_crisis_Mc_Cauley.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Oates, W.E., and R. M. Schwab (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: efficiency enhancing or distorting industry. Journal of Public Economics 35(3): 333–354. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pubeco/v35y1988i3p333-354.html10.1016/0047-2727(88)90036-9Search in Google Scholar

Neary, J. (2006). International trade and the environment: theoretical and policy linkages. Environmental and Resource Economics. 33(1): 95–118. http://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/enreec/v33y2006i1p95-118.html10.1007/s10640-005-1707-4Search in Google Scholar

Peters, G. P., and E.G. Hertwich (2008). CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climatic policy. Environmental Science and Technology 42(5): 1401–407. Available at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es072023kSearch in Google Scholar

Pfluger, M. (2001). Ecological dumping under monopolistic competition. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 103(4): 689–706. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scandj/v103y2001i4p689-706.html10.1111/1467-9442.00266Search in Google Scholar

Rieber, A., and T.A.D. Tran (2009). The effect of unilateral environmental regulation in a world with capital mobility and trade costs. Asian Journal of Accounting and Economics. 16(3): 317–338. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/16081625.2009.9720846Search in Google Scholar

Rubio, S.J., and A. Ulph (2007). An infinite horizon model of dynamic membership of international environmental agreements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54(3): 296–310. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v54y2007i3p296-310.html10.1016/j.jeem.2007.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Shui, B., and R. C. Harriss (2006). The role of CO2 embodiment in the US-China trade. Energy Policy 34(18): 4063–4068. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a34_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a18_3ap_3a4063-063-4068.htm10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.010Search in Google Scholar

Suga, N. (2007). An analysis of the transboundary pollution and gains from trade: reconsidered. Pacific Economic Review 12(2): 225–235. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/blapacecr/v_3a12_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a225-235.htm10.1111/j.1468-0106.2007.00351.xSearch in Google Scholar

USGCRP (2009). Global climate change impacts in the United States. Thomas R. Karl, Jerry M. Melillo, and Thomas C. Peterson (eds.), United States Global Change Research Program. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA. Available at http://downloads.globalchange.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/climate-impacts-report.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

USTR, (2014) The Republic of China: US-China trade facts. http://www.ustr.gov/countries-regions/china-mongolia-taiwan/peoples-republic-china {Accessed 29 August 2014}Search in Google Scholar

Xu, M., B. Allenby, and W. Chen (2009). Energy and air emissions embodied in China-US trade: eastbound assessment using adjusted balanced trade data. Environmental Science and Technology 43(9): 3378–3384. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es803142v10.1021/es803142vSearch in Google Scholar

Zeng, D.Z., and L. Zhao (2009). Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58(2): 141–153. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v58y2009i2p141-153.html10.1016/j.jeem.2008.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-11-11
Revised: 2014-08-08
Accepted: 2014-08-20
Published Online: 2014-08-26
Published in Print: 2014-12-01

© 2014 Johnson Gwatipedza et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 4.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-30/html
Scroll to top button